The Afema mine license has a near-surface oxide and sulphide historical gold resource of 2 million ounces* within an area hosting several gold mineralized structures on extensions from prolific Ghanaian gold belts.
A number of economic and technical studies have been prepared on the project prior to Teranga’s entry into the joint venture. The most recent study was issued in June 2016 by RockRidge Consulting Services Geologists and includes the following mineral resource estimate for the Afema mine license (using a cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au):
Indicated resources of 1.0Moz (combined)
- Oxide: 2.7Mt at 1.26 g/t Au
- Transitional: 1.3Mt at 1.39 g/t Au
- Sulphide: 17.3Mt at 1.55 g/t Au
Inferred resources of 956Koz (combined)
- Oxide: 3.0Mt at 1.26 g/t Au
- Transitional: 0.8Mt at 1.11 g/t Au
- Sulphide: 17.8Mt at 1.40 g/t Au
*A number of economic and technical studies have been prepared on the Afema project prior to Teranga’s entry into the Afema JV with Sodim. The most recent study, which included a mineral resource estimate for the Afema mine license, was issued by RockRidge Consulting Services Geologists for and on behalf of TGL and is dated as of June 27, 2016 (the “June 2016 Historical Estimate”). The June 2016 Historical Estimate includes an Indicated oxide resource estimate of 110Koz (comprised of 2.7Mt at an average grade of 1.26 g/t Au) and Inferred oxide resources of 122Koz (comprised of 3.0Mt at an average grade of 1.26 g/t Au). In addition, it includes an Indicated transitional resource estimate of 59Koz (comprised of 1.3Mt at an average grade of 1.39 g/t Au) and an Inferred transitional resource of 28Koz (comprised of 0.8Mt at an average grade of 1.11 g/t Au). Finally, the June 2016 Historical Estimate provides a sulphide resource estimate as follows: 865Koz Indicated ounces (comprised of 17.3Mt at an average grade of 1.55 g/t Au) and 806Koz inferred ounces (comprised of 17.8Mt at an average grade of 1.40 g/t Au). This historical estimate is reported as using a cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au.
RockRidge further states that it reviewed the geological and grade continuity to supplement the review of data quality in order to confirm the CIM mineral resource classification categories used. As well, the June 2016 Historical Estimate states the following with respect to the basis of the mineral resource estimate:
-
mineralized volumes were received for oxide, transitional and sulphide modelled volumes;
- gold grades were determined using ordinary kriging and Inverse distance squared interpolation (depending on data density) into a 3-dimensional block model constrained by mineralization wireframes;
the block models comprised sub-celled block dimensions of 5m x 5m x 1m and 5m x 5m x 2m (depending on data sampling interval);
- mineralized wireframes were truncated to the topographic surface reflecting the mining that had previously occurred on the property;
- gold values were investigated for outlier values and put though two statistical capping/cutting routines;
- Datamine Studio 3 was the modelling package; and
- relationship between geology and preliminary mining and economic factors was taken into account at all times.
Teranga considers the June 2016 Historical Estimate to be a “historical estimate” as defined under NI 43-101 and relevant as the most recent resource estimate on the Afema project. Further drilling, resource modelling and updates to key economic assumptions would be required to upgrade or verify these historical estimates as current mineral resources and accordingly they should be relied upon only as a historical resource estimate. A Qualified Person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves and Teranga is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves.